Nuclear energy (2025)
Go big and go small
Last updated: 7 Apr 2025
Market 101
The collapse of Sweden’s Northvolt had many writing obituaries for “made in Europe” batteries. These same commentators urge Europe to put its hopes in nuclear power, the future of which is still being fought over.
Go big
Fusion promises to generate near-limitless electricity with no carbon and scant pollution or radioactive waste. Unlike fission — which splits atoms — fusion welds them together. But the machines to do this are vastly complicated and have to control unimaginable temperatures.
So far, the various fusion devices — which often resemble giant, doughnut-shaped chambers — guzzle more energy than they produce.
But a number of startups are closer than ever to harnessing fusion, using fancy magnets, super strong lasers and other exotic parts. Investors who once dismissed fusion as flat-out impossible are now staking hundreds of millions of dollars on it.
If there’s a big fish in the European pond, it’s Munich-based Marvel Fusion: the company’s recent Series B top up made it the region’s best funded nuclear fusion player, taking total funds raised to €385m (we talk to the company’s CFO below). UK-based Tokamak Energy follows with $335m in total funding.
Europe’s fusion hopefuls face formidably-backed US projects, including Pacific Fusion, which raised $900m in October, and Bill Gates-backed Commonwealth Fusion Systems, which has raised $2bn of private funding to date, by far the most in the industry. OpenAI chief Sam Altman, meanwhile, has sunk $375m into Helion Energy, which says it will start using its tech to generate electricity for Microsoft in 2028.
“The US unquestionably boasts the most powerful money mobilisation machine,” Sifted’s editorial director John Thornhill recently wrote. “But Europe still holds some strong cards. France hosts ITER, the multinational nuclear fusion mega-project led by the EU, which has nurtured a whole supply chain of specialist manufacturers in Europe. National governments have also been supportive of the industry.”
And go small
Around a dozen companies in Europe and around the world are betting that they can make nuclear power quicker and cheaper. In the fission world, there’s great hope being placed in a new breed of mini reactors: so-called small modular reactors (SMRs), which ultimately could provide safe low-carbon energy.
France and India plan to work together on SMRs. Engineering giant Rolls-Royce has raised £455m to build prototypes, with almost half of the financing coming from the UK government. Big tech companies Google and Amazon have bought SMRs from a pair of US-based companies, Kairos Power and X-Energy. Swedish SMR developer Blykalla recently landed a €17.5m investment (a mix of grants and equity) from the European Innovation Council.
Proponents say SMRs will be unobtrusive — compared with nuclear plants — and won’t require the same large tracts of land or extensive infrastructure. The components could be mass-produced, making them cheaper and more likely to avoid the delays and cost increases that beset larger plants. SMRs could also provide a steady, around the clock backbone for a continent that’s betting heavily on renewable power.
Obstacles loom. Even if SMRs prove commercially viable, and the risk of nuclear accidents is greatly reduced, will anyone agree to live near these mini reactors? UK prime minister Keir Starmer has vowed to “push past nimbyism” to make SMRs happen. Many turned against nuclear after the 2011 Fukushima disaster — but this hard stance has considerably softened in Europe, as the continent grapples with serious energy security concerns following Russia’s full scale invasion of Ukraine.
Early stage market map
Deals
Key facts
Trends to watch
Interview with Nicolas Burkardt, CFO, Marvel Fusion
Marvel Fusion’s approach to fusion involves blasting hydrogen with lasers to set off a small thermonuclear explosion.
For the company’s CFO, Nicolas Burkardt, this isn’t the first wildly cutting-edge project he’s worked on — he previously helped run the books for electric aircraft maker Volocopter, which filed for insolvency in December.
What Burkardt learned from Volocopter’s failure was the fatal risk of distractions in a company. “They failed because they were not sufficiently focused. At battery maker Northvolt [which filed for bankruptcy in March], it was the same thing, they were building three factories in parallel when they should’ve been focusing on bringing costs down at one factory”.
Marvel has raised €385m, most recently a €50m Series B extension in March. “We’re very well funded now to deliver in a focused manner,” Burkardt says. The company has a public-private partnership with Colorado State University that will serve as a test bed for its technology. The university provides the infrastructure, Marvel comes with the technology. “It saves us the cost of building a big facility,” Burkardt says. The fusion company will not suffer directly from the new US tariffs on Europe. “Some 90% of our spending is in Germany and Europe,” he adds.
Another lesson Burkardt takes from Volocopter: “think more long-term about the capital stack. To turn this into a successful fusion company, we need credible, reputable investors.
“You need VCs but also family offices — Siemens looked at 45 fusion companies and they backed us — and you always need the government on your side. Finally, you need ambassadors — the strategic investors who will spread the word for you. At Volocopter, there was no VC money and no key ambassadors.”
Targeting public funding “proactively is another absolute must,” says Burkardt. Luckily, the new German government is a fusion fan. “We would like to see the world’s first fusion machine in Germany,” Friedrich Merz, the chancellor, has said.
Marvel hopes to demonstrate the feasibility of its machine with a prototype facility in 2032 and a commercial fusion power plant in 2036. Burkardt says the ingredients are there for Europe to lead on the technology. “There's incredible momentum to make fusion the ‘European moonshot’.”
Startups tracked by Sifted
Sifted take
The key lesson from past nuclear plans is to take deadlines with a pinch of salt. This is a bruising field, where bursts of excitement often go unrewarded. Still, there’s sharply growing market pull, as tech giants step up their spending on data centres to stunning levels. There’s also more hope than there’s ever been: startups feel they have the (stratospheric amounts of) money needed to pull this off. Do it right and they can solve the world’s energy needs.
Rising stars
Fusion startup, building a generation of fusion power plants using quasi-isodynamic (QI) stellarators backed by Redalpine and Plural
Round
Seed
Valuation
Undisclosed
Date
2024
Size
€20m
Turns existing nuclear waste into clean energy and produces radioisotopes for medical and industrial applications.
Round
Series A
Valuation
Undisclosed
Date
2024
Size
€21m
Launched by founder Jan Jäderberg, Novatron is backed by EIC and Climentum Capital among others.
Round
Series A
Valuation
Undisclosed
Date
2025
Size
€10.1m
Developing a 100MW reactor based on molten salt technology which recently received €20m in grant.
Round
Grant
Valuation
Undisclosed
Date
2025
Size
€20m
Early stage startups to watch
Astral Systems
€5.4m
€5.4m
-
Blue Capsule
€12.2m
€2m
-
Blykalla
€30.7m
€15m
-
HEXANA
€25.5m
€15m
-
Marvel Fusion
€217m
€50m
-
Newcleo
€572m
€87m
-
Novatron Fusion
€21.5m
€10.2m
-
Otrera New Energy
€2.5m
€2.5m
-
Proxima Fusion
€36.9m
€20m
-
Renaissance Fusion
€47.6m
€31.8m
-
SiteFlow Solution
€19m
€7m
-
Steady Energy
€34.4m
€21.9m
-
Thorizon
€43m
€20m
-
Tokamak Energy
€267m
€46m
-
Transmutex
€38.3m
€21.1m
-
Europe’s success stories
Who early stage startups are up against
(Pre-)Seed
Series A
Series B
Series C
Series D+
IPO/Exit
Paris based, it designs and operates atomic thermal generators to massively decarbonize industry.
(Pre-)Seed
Series A
Series B
Series C
Series D+
IPO/Exit
Backed by Azimut Group and Exor Ventures develops a new industrial standard of clean, safe and inexhaustible energy production from Nuclei
Sources
Data sources
Sifted | Proprietary data
Your feedback
How would you rate this briefing?